CircleCI Terraform provider
under review
Activity Feed
Sort by
![Suthem Buntengchan](https://canny-assets.io/images/7154beebff3fd34373b578e982751661.jpeg)
Suthem Buntengchan
CircleCI concept
Suthem Buntengchan
planted
Submit a Qualification Request
category
titles
Idéer
specs
Please provide as much detail as possible in the case of your use.
Is your post similar to one of them?
Click less (imagine 0) to create a pipe
Since the recent redesign, I took an extra 3 clicks to get to my build pipeline. Prior to design, CircleCI opens with the build pipeline. Combined with UI slowness and questionable decisions, it doesn't show me that the team is in bitbucket or github. This is an overall waste of time.
Qualification Request
Allow links to concepts
The entire thought system uses a single link: https://circleci.com/ideas/. This means that if you find a particular system and want to share it, you will not be able to share the link. CCI-I-553
Qualification Request
On the finished idea creation page, sort, shuffle.
Whenever I have an idea or observation that I believe should be addressed, I create a list in the task/idea sharing area and then look for the following mobilization to promote or immediately verify the merits of my idea, while the page confirm/do. The idea id does not include ideas created anywhere on the page and the URL remains unchanged (located https://circleci.com/ideas/). As a new supporter and regular user, I am not aware of the conventions of Website and should not know the conference to share my thoughts with a wider audience, since conferences can change, this is the smallest way to promote the convenience of your social broadcasting. Specific platforms can be enabled for circular idea sharing such as twitter, facebook and so on. That can be a lot of thinking. CCI-I-672
Qualification Request
Send ideas
![Jim Crowley](https://canny.io/images/2a03b393f3799374c6433e50f0503922.png)
Jim Crowley
While not official, there is some community work being done on a Terraform provider: https://github.com/kelvintaywl/terraform-provider-circleci
K
Kristian Petersen
Hi, Any news regarding this topic?
![Eugene Vilensky](https://canny.io/images/22335557c4dbab9138949995b4eff3b1.jpg)
Eugene Vilensky
Hello Olaf,
This work is much appreciated, and sounds like the foundation for building a provider that would fit our needs.
The other key part I would like to see as a paying customer is for circleci to commit to a canonical Golang
client
that supports these APIs. Having a standard client stewarded by the company is a standard feature of other enterprises we do business with. At this time it is hard to commit to writing both the boilerplate client code and the boilerplate terraform code to fit our needs.The circleci cli appears to have an embedded client so maybe you can abstract and build on that? https://github.com/CircleCI-Public/circleci-cli/tree/develop/api
Thirdly is while we can of course build a provider to meet our needs, a provider managed by circleCI would be the ideal
O
Olaf Molenveld
Eugene Vilensky: thanks for your feedback Eugene Vilensky!
O
Olaf Molenveld
Hi all, i'm the product manager of our public API. Although it's not a Terraform provider, we now do have new API v2 experimental endpoints that allow you to create/follow and configure projects programmatically through the API.
You can find more info on this here:
We are very interested in your feedback, let us know what you think!
K
Kristian Petersen
Im very surprised that we still dont see any progress on this request. Having an official terraform provider is a must by many companies to be able to keep up with security requirements. We use a long list of cloud services and CircleCI is the only one missing a provider.
![Nathan Fish](https://canny.io/images/9fa7547eda7aa4058a45ab6335dacfc4.png)
Nathan Fish
under review
We have started work on the APIs required to support project creation. Once those APIs are available it should be possible to use Terraform or another solution to interact with the APIs.
![Gavin Clarke](https://canny.io/images/4f927311ac69e38bfe7a189976369ea3.png)
Gavin Clarke
Still no news. Just wanted to point out that the recent security breach further highlights the need for this provider. A terraform provider would make it significantly easier to manage any secrets stored in contexts and would make it straightforward to rotate them on a regular basis.
![Ray Smets](https://canny.io/images/3068fc3eb6c0a514e5cfd791c482a182.png)
Ray Smets
Completely agree with the others here, an official provider would be so appreciated and useful. It is the end of 2022 and still no official provider is super surprising and slightly concerning in regard to the future of CircleCi as a leading service provider.
J
Jon Middleton
This would be very useful, for something as key as enabling CI I would very much prefer a Terraform provider owned by CircleCI over a community project.
This would be so useful, as it could allow developers to self-serve setting up a new project with CI enabled and automatically having access to things like Hashicorp Vault & AWS.
Load More
→